|
![]() |
|
| Expert Services | Child Custody | Home |
Standards of Care-School Related Sexual Harassment and Abuse Cases-Cases involving sexual impropriety in school settings require particular sensitivity to the circumstances of the case in general, and to the specific standards of care issues involved. Sexual harassment is not a new phenomenon. Sadly, however, within the last decade, it has become a household term. School administrators have been on notice regarding sexual harassment since the 1950's. The topics of professionalism, propriety, and protecting oneself against sexually related incidents have been items of discussion and concern for the past 40 years on the part of all school employees. Prudent school administrators are constantly aware of situations that could become awkward and have a responsibility to alert school staff to those potentially damaging circumstances. The universally accepted standard of care known for years in education circles is for staff members to avoid situations that have sexual implications, to avoid being alone with a student in a confined area without an adult witness, and to report any and all observed abusive behavior to local Human Services officials (a requirement of the law in most states). The California Commission on Teacher Credentialling recently acknowledged that for the past five years 25 to 30 teachers have been convicted every year of sexual offenses involving minors. Obviously, this number only acknowledges convictions, which are difficult, at best, to obtain. Add to that the number of incidents that go unreported and multiply those numbers times 50 states, and it becomes vividly clear that molestation of students by school employees is neither unusual nor uncommon. On the other hand, fortunately, the percentage of teachers who molest students remains small. A number of problems surround sexual molestation by teachers. Because such acts are not expected, when they are reported, school officials often are in a state of shock and disbelief. The accused employee often initially denies the charges. Sexual molesters also tend to be multiple offenders. Another problem associated with harassment is the failure of the abused to report abuse to an adult at school or to discuss it with their own family. Some students simply drop the class or avoid the instructor and never reveal the reason. Criminal action certainly can be taken against a school employee who is involved in the sexual harassment of a student or other employee, no matter what level of abuse occurs. On the other hand, it is more difficult to determine whether the school district should be held responsible and liable for the sexually abusive conduct of one of its employees. The nature of the harassment and the position the employee holds in the school district are both important considerations. A greater level of responsibility and liability occurs on the part of the school system if the employee has broad supervisory responsibility over other employees. Even greater school system responsibility exists where supervisory personnel knew or should have known about the abusive conduct and failed to take immediate corrective action. Since students and school district employees can recover monetary damages from school districts under provisions of Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, plaintiffs need to ask many pertinent questions and obtain copies of all related school policies and personnel files when persuing sexual harassment cases. Sample questions might include the following:
These are but a few of the questions that need to be asked when representing a client who is the victim of sexual abuse. SchoolMatch® consultants will work with you to be sure to cover every aspect of the case related to school responsibility, administration, policy, and procedures. |
|
Copyright © 2008 by Public Priority Systems, Inc.
|